This is it, I'm certain that this is the best proof I'll ever need for this channel that I was right

*COPPA DISCLAIMER*
(My content is directed towards anyone of any age. This video will be my only video posted on this channel and is a totally safe video for all ages.)

This channel and I do not claim any right over any of the graphics, images, used in this video. All rights reserved to the respective copyright owners.

according to logic, you can't feel what you can't touch. emotions aren't an exception. you can't feel the emotions that you can't touch. you can't touch any emotions. if you can't grab an emotion, then you surely cant touch one. we feel physical things only by touching them. how can we feel non physical things without touching them? there's no such thing as non physical touching, so you cant touch an emotion. if I could feel an emotion, then there has to be a way to feel it without touch.

if we couldn't feel emotions, would it be because we couldn't even touch them, since touch is a physical sense, or would it be for some other reason?

even if we did feel emotions physically, they'd be in the brain, but we don't even feel what's in our brain moving necessarily. but if we feel emotions in our brain, then this still is a non existent paradox by the laws of logic and by my arguments, and it's nothing more than a irrational notion and claim, regardless of what proof I've given and that others have given that emotions are not physical.

our emotions are formed by our thoughts. the soul is our thoughts. we can't create physical emotions merely by thinking and existing. that's like saying we're creating atoms out of nothing. even the Bible says something doesn't come from nothing.

it's like asking, how can the untouchable (the immaterial) touch the touchable (the material) to form physical emotions. whenever the untouchable exists, it's untouchable. If so then it can never touch the material. so when the untouchable exists, it's not touching anything. if all of that is true but the untouchable touches the touchable anyway, then how is it not a paradox?

https://www.brainfacts.org/ask-an-expert/if-the-brain-cant-feel-pain-why-do-i-get-headaches#:~:text=The%20brain%20itself%20does%20not,while%20the%20patient%20is%20awake.

according to the above article the brain can't even feel pain. if that's true, what's the chances we can feel emotions?

there's a correlation between brain activity and emotions, but that's just a parlor trick used by God to make unintelligent humans think emotions are in the brain. if you removed emotions from the brain, the brain would weigh less, but modern day technology has tested the weight of a brain with emotional activity, and its the same weight as it is without it. that proves if emotions are physically in the brain, they have no weight, which is a paradox, since only light has no weight according to neurotypicals.

This is similar to my video on how "if the soul is in the brain, why can't we feel it moving in there?".

if the brain can't create the soul and it's components (thoughts) how can it create emotions, which are only created by thoughts? if emotions exist in the brain, then that's because the brain creates them, but how? how can the brain convert it's own particles into emotion particles? even if it does that there would be major health issues with every brain, resulting in mental illness for all, just as I had argued since the start.

This is it, I'm certain that this is the best proof I'll ever need for this channel that I was right


Recorded by XRecorder: https://recorder.page.link/Best

Post a Comment

0 Comments